Psst, hey
lost_spook!
Jul. 13th, 2013 05:47 pmGuess who is the most well-rounded writer on Teaspoon?
By which I mean the entropy of the distribution of eras in your stories is as closest to uniform across all eras as anyone gets in the database. And you have a lot of stories too!
I shall have a true post up at some point but am off to a picnic now so pictures will have to wait.
By which I mean the entropy of the distribution of eras in your stories is as closest to uniform across all eras as anyone gets in the database. And you have a lot of stories too!
I shall have a true post up at some point but am off to a picnic now so pictures will have to wait.
no subject
Date: 2013-07-14 08:36 am (UTC)I thought I'd skewed myself to Three with all the Brig/Liz fics, and then there's my failure to write much New Who...
*basks in new-found... er... what would you call it?*
:-D
(I like your Teaspoon stats even more now. That's probably the only thing in my life I'll ever come out on top of.)
♥
no subject
Date: 2013-07-14 02:55 pm (UTC)The measure of uniformity that I am using is called entropy: it reaches its maximum when a distribution is completely equal across all categories and its minimum when one category is the only category there is (think, eg, 15 Ten/Rose stories and that's it). It is calculated by taking -1 times the sum of each of the percentages times their natural logarithm.
There are only four authors in the database who have entries for every one of the 16 eras (1-11, Other Doctors, Other Era, Multi-Era, Torchwood and Sarah Jane Adventures): you, JJPOR, johne, and Gary Merchant.
But for example, comparing your entry with
Comparing your entry with
Here is the data. "StoryMode" and "StoryMax" are the category and value for your highest percentage. StoryEraEntropy is the entropy calculation. I have the data for stories weighted by word count as well but sticking just with counting each story equally regardless of length, this is what you get:
The highest possible entropy someone could achieve across 16 categories is the score you get for having 1/16 in each category, eg 2.77. You are at 90% of that with your score.
Now for 14 categories, the highest possible entropy you get is for having 1/14 in each category, eg 2.639. Discounting Torchwood and Sarah Jane,
It may be a bit difficult to interpret outright because of the flexibility with which authors may or may not use the "Multi-Era" or "Other Era" tag. But I think it's pretty well principled.
no subject
Date: 2013-07-14 04:19 pm (UTC)(And, um, *cough*, I just may have been on your list of authors who wrote in all 16 categories if I hadn't done that . . .)
no subject
Date: 2013-07-14 04:48 pm (UTC);-p
no subject
Date: 2013-07-14 08:15 pm (UTC)Athough actually, I'd be interested in a separate "roundedness" measure that only looked at single-era stories -- for example, I wouldn't say I'm much of an Eighth Doctor writer just because I included him in my "Spotter's Guide" fic. Using a single-era definition, I'm sure you'd still be well ahead of me. ;p
I'd also be interested in seeing "roundedness" defined by the number of different characters written.
no subject
Date: 2013-07-15 12:31 am (UTC)Well I did count stories with multiple eras differently: So that the counts for tags added up to the number of stories, if a story had K tags, then I added 1/K to each of the counts for the tags. So a Multi-Era story that was tagged as Multi-Era and with Doctors 1 through 11 eras would put a count of 1/12 on each of those tags. So if you wrote one Eleventh era story and one multi-era story with doctors 1 through 10, you would not count as completely uniform; your single era story would have more of a weight on Eleven.
The other way that I did it (which I didn't report these answers) was as above but also weighted by word count. So, if you wrote one Eleventh era story of 100 words, and a 1000-word story that had doctors 1 through 10, then your distribution would be uniform. But if you wrote a 150k word Eleventh era novel, and also had an Eight ficlet of 1000 words, you would be weighted much more toward Eleven.
I was also thinking about doing the distribution by character. That would pick up on your stories for example, that you labeled "Multi-Era" but had all of the doctors from 1 to 11. (which is also why you did not show up as having representation for all 16 eras as you rightly guessed: I thought you had meant that you labeled all the eras separately but didn't bother clicking "multi-era" but it was the other way around. My db says you have 26 stories as of the end of February this year, across 10 eras; looking at your stories, I think if I coded them with the eras suggested by the characters in the summaries, you would have 15 out of 16, missing only "Other Doctors" possibly).
The only problem is that because of how they were scraped from the website, I have a little bit of manual recoding to do for the character lists. There is a hard space limit on the webpage, and so for stories that list lots and lots of characters, sometimes the names got chopped off at the end. So I'd need to fix those and then figure out which characters to count (all of them?) in the calculations or not. But yeah, that also will be able to highlight & pick out the New Era authors who write lots of New Era Characters. Or eg, distinguish between the person who writes only Four and Sarah Jane vs. the person who writes Four and Sarah Jane, Harry, Leela, Romana and K-9. It will be sparser than the Eras and also there is likely a bit more uncertainty due to self-reporting. You have to pick an era but you don't have to list characters (do you?). And some people list every character, and some just the main characters, etc.
no subject
Date: 2013-07-15 01:39 am (UTC)Oooh, yes, very nice way of handling it!
And yes, I clicked only Multi-Era and not any of the other eras for my two multi-Doctor stories. Also, for one of them ("Fallacy Somewhere"), the character list was long, so instead of listing out all the companions who appear in it (11 of them), I just clicked "other characters." It's people like me who mess up archival data . . . ;)
And some people list every character, and some just the main characters, etc.
True! And I have come across authors who list characters just because they were mentioned in the fic, when the character otherwise has nothing to do with the fic at all.
My db says you have 26 stories as of the end of February this year, across 10 eras; looking at your stories, I think if I coded them with the eras suggested by the characters in the summaries, you would have 15 out of 16, missing only "Other Doctors" possibly
Not that I looked, except that I did . . . ; ) My fic "Fallacy Somewhere" has "Other Doctors" in it, but those Doctors only "appear" as snatches of dialogue because I needed thirteen Doctors (one per G&S operetta). So yes, I agree with you.
*makes plans to write a proper "Other Doctor" story so she can pretend to be a well-rounded author*
Anyway, really interesting stuff! I hope I haven't been too annoying . . . and I hope that when you eventually disseminate this more widely, you don't get bombarded with a bunch of people asking you to change the data based on their idiosyncratic situations!
no subject
Date: 2013-07-15 01:53 am (UTC)So I certainly welcome the input. I've been tooling around this data set for a little while and am quite enjoying it. I wish I had a better way of updating all of the data, because I've added a Third Doctor and Fourth Doctor story to my Teaspoon set since February but my percentages in the data are still 0s for them...
no subject
Date: 2013-07-15 11:32 am (UTC)Yes, I think I have written at least one story for every era - I'm not absolutely sure about Nine, though. I've written him in multi-era fics and in drabble collections, but I can't think of any others. My "Other Doctors" fic won't surprise anyone - I only have one of those because I wrote fic for David Collings's audio Doctor from Big Finish's Unbound series.
If you wrote Curse of Fatal Death fic or something, that could go in Other Doctors? That could be a thing. ;-D
Yes, I'm absolutely sure
no subject
Date: 2013-07-15 12:53 pm (UTC)Oooh, I really liked that story too. :D
I think Richard E Grant's WebCast 9 would count as "Other Doctors", as well as Fatal Death, any attempts to scoop Moffatt on the John Hurt character, any of the other Unbound audios, and perhaps Peter Cushing from the 60s movie(s?).
no subject
Date: 2013-07-15 07:47 pm (UTC)And, yes. I think the number of other Doctors is quite large in total! There would also be the stage play Doctors (if anyone's ever written those) and no doubt Doctors from fan-made stuff.
no subject
Date: 2013-07-14 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-07-14 04:52 pm (UTC)Anyway, thanks - your stats are always interesting and it cheered me up a lot this morning!! :-D
no subject
Date: 2013-07-15 01:07 pm (UTC)If I go by the Word Count entropy score, the top 5 are Crackers and Cheese (7 stories), golden orange (8 stories), DTA (13 stories), you (90 stories), and Arthur Dent (2 stories). But the difference is that those authors all have actually very few stories, but lots of multi-era stories that are well tagged. DTS is the only one other than you in that list who has more than 25000 total words. She has 213000, and you have 734000. Which is why for the ranking I went with entropy by story and not by word count.
no subject
Date: 2013-07-14 07:00 pm (UTC)*BOUNCES*
no subject
Date: 2013-07-15 04:30 am (UTC)I am fairly entertained by these statistics. As soon as I started reading I started trying to figure out what other authors might be in the AllSixteen club. I thought of the JJ and Johne straightaways, and, while I haven't read much of his fic, Gary_Merchant doesn't surprise me any because he does have A LOT. I was somewhat surprised that Dbskyler, AstroGirl, and a few others who regularly show up on Calufrax didn't make it.
no subject
Date: 2013-07-15 11:35 am (UTC)(And, yes, I'd have expected there to be more of us - but probably excluding spin-offs, there are - no doubt people like Calapine and Clocket Patch as well.)
no subject
Date: 2013-07-16 01:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-07-15 11:59 am (UTC)The distribution of eras (discounting characters, which as
I looked at the 35 authors with 13 or more out of 16 eras represented. Depending on the breakdown of who they wrote and when, even those with lots of eras can have (relatively) lower entropy, but yes, lots of familiar names show up. Here is them ranked by story entropy, but I also included their stats for the breakdown weighted by story (S) and word count (W):
(in next comment due to size)
no subject
Date: 2013-07-15 12:02 pm (UTC)Other authors should go in this table likely, barring tagging inconsistencies/peculiarities as discussed.
(ETA: LJ is being stupid slow for me :( )
no subject
Date: 2013-07-15 07:48 pm (UTC):-)
no subject
Date: 2013-07-16 02:01 am (UTC)