![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
NOTE: There are mild spoilers in here from a few two-sentence summaries of the final two episodes that have been floating around in DW Magazine and as released by the BBC.
Amy and the Doctor went to visit Van Gogh in early June, 1890, so the story says. Van Gogh killed himself at the end of July, 1890, so it was indeed not only "less than a year" before he committed suicide but less than two months. Still, he is painting Wheat Field With Crows at the beginning of the episode and we clearly see evidence of something shambling through the field, disturbing the crows.
Question is, is it artistic license? Because scholars appear to agree that while not his last painting, "Wheat Field with Crows" was actually painted in July of 1890, which would have been a month after the Doctor and Amy visited Van Gogh. Is this a foreshadowing? Is there something else lurking in the wheat fields? We also know, for example that "The Doctor's friends unite to send him a terrible warning" in the final two episodes, and from the DWM blurb that in the finale "A Van Gogh painting is ferried across thousands of years." So is it "Wheat Field with Crows"? Timey-wimey-ness, indeed...
PS: If you know for certain because you've clicked on more spoilers than I have (which, um, yeah, the above are ALL I KNOW about the finale), don't send me links or anything, but if you want to speculate spoiler-free in the comments, go ahead ;)
In other news, I did quite like that episode a lot. And am glad. Off to watch again. Further comments to come.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 09:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 10:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 10:37 pm (UTC)There's an SFX spoiler: 10 There’s a major story element that some will decry as a massive plot hole and others will embrace on a metaphorical level
Would that reference the timeline of the painting? And if so, seems like SFX decided it was placed for metaphorical purposes. Of course, other films have placed that painting later, I guess, saying it was his last, so what's placing it a little earlier, right? Then again, SFX might not have full information either. Hm.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 10:41 pm (UTC)They might also just mean Vincent picking up on Amy having a maybe-sort-of-possibly having the Lost Somebody vibe. Makes no sense going by the letter of the plot, but big on the metaphorical warm-fuzzies.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 11:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-06 12:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-06 12:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 10:40 pm (UTC)Must be brief as we're having weather heareabouts...the kind where one turns laptops off. ;)
no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 10:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 10:48 pm (UTC)So...Timey Wimey: I think the issue of time being re-written is fascinating. The fact that some things change, others not so much and the way both Amy and the Doctor react to that is very well portrayed.
So wonderful how the sunflowers were for Amy. And the look on her face was perfect, as if she felt more real and present in her own life during that moment. At the same time the way The Doctor processed what she was feeling was lovely and edged.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 10:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-06 05:37 am (UTC)hunt down as many spoilers as possibleread other series speculation in the coming week. Thanks for sharing. :)no subject
Date: 2010-06-06 03:12 pm (UTC)