More thoughts on The Time of Angels
Apr. 25th, 2010 08:41 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, I am curious. Last week we had a giant improbable and never-explained WTF moment in the whole "stopping the Dalek bomb with love" plot point, and it really just didn't work very well at all. But this week we have another whole giant improbable WTF and not-well-explained moment in that oh yeah, "that which takes the image of an Angel becomes itself an Angel." Just as much out of the blue and not explained, the image on the TV gets imbued with an Angel soul (somehow) and steps out of its picture to become an Angel. Think about it. This makes no sense, really. But this scene actually seemed to work, at least better than last week's, if fan reactions on lj are any account (my reaction included. I am quite prepared to handwave that moment because I thought it was a cool, creepy scene).
Why does the first giant handwave fall flat and the second one get a pass? Does it have to do with tone and pacing? Or the fact that the biology of these monsters is already so ridiculous and improbable that we can just add new talents without suspending that much more disbelief? I think maybe it is actually a case of writing the improbable to obtain the "right" emotional response. If the "magic" ability tells a better story, then we forgive it, and as an audience we are quite good at judging what a good story entails.
Thoughts?
no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 01:52 am (UTC)